Posts Tagged ‘Wei Wu Wei’

A Glimpse of THE BIG AHA

January 18th, 2010

There were times when life seemed more dreamlike than real, but in defense of the assumption the self is real, or must be real for me to be real, these thoughts were dismissed as “unscientific,” and even delusional. In spite of resistance, aka amnesia and trance, I was aware that ‘clients’ relied on suffering to portray ‘not okay people,’ convincingly. Since I didn’t want to know I was doing the same thing, too, even these insights were dismissed to preserve the assumption that right now is real, and not a dream, and that ‘suffering’ is sufficient to maintain the assumption that people are victims, enduring their difficult lives. I noticed, at some preconscious level, that clients said they wanted relief from their suffering, but when you began to meddle with the mechanism of suffering, resistance said, in effect, “I need my suffering to anchor the self as a real, less than okay self.” In my own unconscious state, I perceived this as a “strange paradox”: they pay good money to find relief from suffering at the conscious level of functioning, but the unconscious sends a very different message: “my suffering defines me, and even though I hate it, hating it keeps it in place as objectively awful.”

Once a client locks into the conclusion the self they have is ‘damaged,’ life provides the setting to live this assumption for the duration, if need be. The idea we are who we insist we are depends on the assumption the self, as we define it, exists as proof we are who we insist we are, including a ‘damaged person.’ The implication is a shocker: defending the assumption we are who the self says we are takes precedence over everything, including well being, happiness, love, and a life that is relatively trouble free. Suffering works to defend the assumption the self is real, and that ‘a suffering self’ is the epitome of the real. Apparently, the experience of suffering is secondary to the defense of the assumption the self is real.
» Read more: A Glimpse of THE BIG AHA

The Shift

December 30th, 2009

If you read Wei Wu Wei’s books, sooner or later you ask the question, which is stranger, his synthesis of the Buddhist view of reality, or how we fill reality defending the lie truth is false? It is no accident that we are firmly entrenched in our defense of what we insist reality is. Amnesia successfully shields us from the possibility that what we defend as “the truth” is false, and that what amnesia keeps out of mind, successfully, is the truth. What comes into focus is the growing awareness that the defense of what we refer to “the truth” is “The Main Event.” As long as your own amnesia works to obscure what the truth might be, you can’t see that you are part of a vast team devoted to proving truth is false, or doesn’t exist. This is what we do. Time is the venue for TAG, or “The Anti-truth Game.” As truth comes into focus, you identify that TAG is an index of the degree to which someone defends the lie truth is false, from some of the time, to all of the time. The more this becomes transparent, the faster you identify the connection between our ‘mental health’ and where we are with the truth.

If time is the venue for the game of TAG, or the sum and intensity of what we do to pretend we can prove truth is false, then it should follow that those whose presentation indicates they are in sync with truth should display what we refer to as “good mental health.” In fact, low TAG individuals, who don’t fill time ‘at war with truth,’ come across as objective (awake), rational, non delusional and appropriate. Conversely, the high TAG individuals display increasing ‘mental instability,’ the more they fill time defending the fiction it’s possible to prove truth is false.
» Read more: The Shift

Comes The Dawning

December 11th, 2009

The problem with truth, so to speak, is that, apparently, it is 180 degrees out of phase with what we insist it is. There is what the truth is, and then there is what we do as a team to defend what we insist it is. Waking up includes making the shift from what we insist it is, back to what it is, so we can look at how we work as a team to defend what we insist it is. I call this process “The Recovery Process.” This is the work I do now: I assist individuals to reconnect with the truth so they can identify how they fill time pretending they can prove truth is false. Suffering is the clue it isn’t possible to prove truth is false. The evidence mounts that there is a huge connection between truth and our determination to prove truth is false. How much do we suffer by defending the fiction we can prove truth is false? How much do we use suffering as proof for the fiction truth is false?

It makes sense to dismiss Wei Wu Wei’s synthesis of the Buddhist view of reality because it is 180 degree out of phase with the view of reality the majority of us defend as “the truth.” He gets to be called ‘that crazy man,’ or that ‘iconoclastic heretic,’ or whatever epithet works to ignore the possibility that what he has to say has to do with the truth. The truth is, we don’t want to know what the truth is. The truth is we hate truth because it always obligates us to revise views we treat as sacred, like the sun rotates around the earth. When Copernicus said this wasn’t true, he almost lost his life for challenging the prevailing view of truth. As I write, the haploid collider at Cern intends to smash particles to look for the Higgs Boson, a particle given the nick name of “The God Particle” because, if found, it will result in a single equation that explains the ‘mechanics of the universe.’ We are on the threshold, perhaps, of finding the elusive, “Unified Field Theory” that has escaped description, so far.

Truth exists outside of current imagination because truth and imagination are part of a single process. Imagination expands the more truth reveals itself, and the more truth reveals itself, the faster imagination expands. Right now, imagination is waiting for the next shoe to fall. Historically, this is another moment of ‘breathlessness’; part fear, part hope, and part suspicion that we have a date with truth, no matter how much truth runs the rate at which it reveals itself to us. We are suspended in time, waiting to discover why we are only right about something for this moment in time. Surely most of what is ‘right’ today, will be exposed as false soon enough.
» Read more: Comes The Dawning

Wei Wu Wei’s Message

October 29th, 2009

A close friend, who enjoyed a work shop I gave, asked me one afternoon if I had ever heard of Wei Wu Wei, aka Terence Gray? He handed me the book, Open Secret,” and I asked him, “what’s it all about.” He replied, “I have no idea. Read it and let me know what you think it’s all about.” I took it home, opened it after dinner, and the next thing I knew it was dawn. I sat there stunned, with some vague awareness that his message not only resonated at some deep unconscious level, but this book was ‘the game changer’ in my life.’ In one full swoop, he made it clear why nothing is what we insist it is. There is reality, and then then there is our rendition of reality which is unreal and defended as real. In a cold sweat, I saw what worked and didn’t work about psychotherapy. I was too stunned to experience the humor inherent in reality, as he defined it. Years passed before I realized that the disparity of his view of reality, and the version of reality we argue for, is what humor is.

Wei Wu Wei devoted the later part of his life to the deconstruction of Buddhist philosophy. He made what appeared to be a very abstract topic relatively simple. His synthesis of Buddhist ideas illuminated what passes for polarization between West and East. On the surface, they appear to defend the notion of duality, but on closer inspection, what came into focus is that they are two aspects of a single process. East focused more on the origin of reality, while West focuses on defending the assumption that reality is really real. The input (East) manifests as the output (West), and the two work as one. East views West with humor, while West views East with periodic alarm.
» Read more: Wei Wu Wei’s Message

The Root of Consciousness

October 16th, 2009

First off, I want to thank everyone for showing interest in TRP. Between Face Book, Twitter (@gregorytucker), and this web site, the response has been very exciting. Many of you are interested in the concept of ‘waking up,’ or reconnecting with “The Big Picture.’ This is what there is to recover. Truth exists and what stands between it and you is amnesia. There is nothing to resist but truth, and the job of amnesia is to reject it as if it is gone, or doesn’t exist, so we can defend our rendition of what we want truth to be.

TRP starts with what the truth could be in order to identify how you create duality to defend the fiction defection from truth is possible. Truth reveals that the option to defect from truth is zero, which means duality is a fiction we rely on to pretend defection from truth is possible. TRP makes it possible to identify that suffering goes with the sum of what we do to defend the fiction defection from truth is possible. We suffer because all attempts to defect from truth are doomed to failure. TRP makes it possible for you to see why this is so. Your emotions already indicate that you know, at some pre-conscious level, that because truth is unitary, the option to defect from truth is a parody. No one can defect from truth, and life is the context that displays the sum of all the ways we create duality to defend the fiction defection from truth is possible. Defending the fiction defection from truth is possible underscores the origin of all suffering.
» Read more: The Root of Consciousness